Search TC Blox
Only on TC-BLOX.NET
91 results found with an empty search
- Admin Abuse Resistance | TC Blox Studios
The Admin Abuse Resistance (AAR) collects screenshot evidence of raiding, doxxing, and other violating behavior on Discord, taken up by raid groups such as the UTTP and others. Admin Abuse Resistance The Admin Abuse Resistance (AAR) is a Discord Server and Community that reports and fights against Raiders, Doxxers, Hateful Propaganda, Admin Abuse, and other abuses of power on Discord primarily. It has been recreated a new several times and has existed in some capacity since 2020. The AAR was created by and is under the management of TonyTCB (jimmybob) . Apply to Join Home History of the AAR Evidence Gallery Statistics and Activity Apply to Join Abuse Reports AAR Menu More Philosophy of Anti-Abuse The Admin Abuse Resistance is founded on Yoggism, under the justification of Yogg Interest Theory , the theory that the Fulfillment of Interests as a value is the source of ethics and rational justification itself. This then justifies actions taken against those abusing their influence, as they represent inherent frustration against other's Interest Fulfillment. The AAR specifically enforces actions against Admin Abuse following the justification of Yoggism's Anti-Abuse Principle . [see more on Yoggism here] History of the AAR Creation of the AAR The original Admin Abuse Resistance Discord Server was created on May 3rd, 2021 (03/05/2021) by TonyTCB and Qaz, to fight admin abuse in various servers. Cluurs, TNT Debates Shortly after it's creation, the AAR's members took action against various servers for Admin Abuse and violation of Discord's TOS, including servers such as TNT Debates, and a server owned by the Roblox YouTuber Cluurs, among 43 reports of abuse in total. Later, the AAR helped fix vague wording of server rules in RexYT Gaming Lounge, after sending a warning to their admins. (05/04/2021) (M/D/Y) Pop Mod Abuse (Anti-Memery) A server by the name of Pop had a moderator within it that went rogue and deleted memes and muted people for their own enjoyment. The AAR's owner and members, and members of yegg, got in contact with the server's owner to stop the Mod Abuse. Mod Revolt against Abuse Around (09/21/2021) (M/D/Y), TonyTCB with help from other AAR members got moderators in various servers to revolt against their admins for admin abuse. Server of ImCadezxYT had an admin ban a user for unfair reasons, mods went against the server. In the Quiden Modern Warriors server, after a report of blatant admin abuse, the users involved were banned from the server. Poutineka the Threat A user by the name of Poutineka, attempted to report a member of the Universe server, to a user named ZuriProto, the owner of Pop, to try and prevent a mod promotion. Poutineka was later found to have been meddling in AAR affairs, and harassment of users in Universe. Problems in the Universe server were later resolved. The Meme Wars The owner of Pop, ZuriProto, created a new server named The Existence Realm. Around 01/10/2021 (D/M/Y), fights broke out in the chats of the server between Panad and Null, and TonyTCB along with other members of yegg, petitioned the owner for Panad and Null to be banned for griefing, harassment, and spam. Kindel Incident A user by the name of Kindel342, owner of Universe, was given ownership of the AAR. Later, they committed acts of Admin Abuse, and tried to demote people for criticism. TonyTCB tricked Kindel into giving back ownership, then promptly turned on them, reporting them to Discord along with their alt accounts, and banning them from AAR servers. Years later, Kindel apologized and was let back into the AAR by TonyTCB. TOS Violations and Endangerment A list of servers engaging in Nitro Scams, Underage Dating, Mass Invite Spam, and other violations were reported to Discord, including the servers of Roblox Halloween Rewards, The Lonelys, and "Kisses Klub". Anti-Furry Raiders and Cleanup Various servers including Wolf Nation Gaming, were reported and shut down for Anti-Furry Harassment. Action was taken against servers associated with Kindel, and Null was successfully reported to Discord after coming back and being banned again via a community poll in the new Zuri's Realm. Null's Carnage Unfortunately, Null (nulyboy) returned to Zuri's Realm after being "permanently banned". He incited another meme war, and a day later all of yegg besides Oryan, along with 5 random users, got banned from the server unexpectedly. DiamondYoshi, a friend of TonyTCB, almost lost contact with Zuri for being in contact with yegg. Later, the server collapsed and 70/75 of the remaining members of Zuri's Realm were collectively kicked from the server. Minutes later, all recorded invites shut down. Blebcord Users XLPS4, Null, and Zyeraz, were in a new server named Zyeraz Trash House, later renamed to Blebcord. They attempted spam, raiding, and made doxxing threats against various users, and were promptly reported to Discord. XLPS4 and Null were successfully banned, and Zyeraz began spreading misinformation and false-raiding accusations against the AAR for uncovering the doxxing threats made. SOC / United Coalition Blacklisting Users present on the SOC Raid Server, along with servers involved with United Coalition, CG Chaos, Sovereign Albanian Imperium, The OFN Reborn, and various Neo-Nazi servers, along with servers related to the owner of United Coalition, Warror667, were all reported to Discord and taken down successfully. Anti-Furry Raid Groups A giant campaign against Anti-Furry Raid Servers, and Neo-N#zi servers, involving GERMAN IRON ORDER, Anti Furry Central Hub, Alliance Bunker, Anti-Furry Coalition, Gaskmask Legion, The Sovereign Affliction, and others. Somewhere between 7 and 20+ servers were taken down. Anti-UTTP Takedowns The UTTP (UTubeTrollPolice), a group targeting communities and engaging in mass spam, was targeted by the AAR. Servers including ZeNesantTrollPolice, 148 Marine Corps, EvolveExterminationCult, SKITTLES HATER POLICE, among others, were reported and taken down successfully. Later campaigns against the UTTP proved successful against the Troll Police Order State gateway server, fishy resistance cartel bunker, Sovereign Unaki, and other servers. UTTP Police Reports and Major Espionage Campaign UTTP servers were discovered on around (2025/09/11) (Y/M/D) by Investigator TimModelsStuff; servers are Empire, The deviantart duck division, "j####h lifes dont matter", "anti degeneracy police force". These servers were shortly infiltrated by TimModelsStuff with help from another Anti-UTTP server, and they filed police reports against a specific UTTP member supposedly impersonating Zytherox, allegedly "the biggest groomer of UTTP history", the user later got house arrest after being infiltrated by the FBI for possession of illegal abuse content. Statistics and Activity The AAR's actions against Admin Abuse, Raiding, Hateful Spam, and Doxxing, yield a 65-70% success rate in reports. A full list of our registered Abuse Reports cases can be found here . Resolved Cases: 52+ Blacklist Count: 69 Total Servers Shut Down: 54 (minimum) Large Case Count: 14 Total Case Count: 76 Last Updated: 21/09/2025 (D/M/Y) Apply to Join the AAR The Admin Abuse Resistance needs to have some amount of security to prevent spam, espionage, and sabotage. If you would like to help us in our activities, please fill out the form before joining the server. Once you join the server, you will need to verify using the Double Counter bot so we know you are not an alt account, and then DM an Admin for verification. Join Server via Disboard Full Name or Nickname (required) Date of Birth (required) * required Email Address (required) Phone Number (optional) Position Applying For Your Discord Username (not display name, username) Submit Application submitted. We'll get back to you. Evidence The Admin Abuse Resistance (AAR) collects screenshot evidence of raiding, doxxing, and other violating behavior on Discord, taken up by raid groups such as the UTTP. Below is a slideshow showcasing screenshots and details about reports involving the UTTP, United Coalition, and others. Warrior889 Raiding via Alt Accounts . Warrior889 (notorious raider) talking about using disposable alt accounts to conduct raids for the SOC Raid Group. Abuse Reports by the AAR Below is a full list of all registered Abuse Report cases, complete with descriptions and statuses. They are all formatted as a single block of text for ease of modification and archiving. CONTENT WARNING: May contain Profanity, Offensive Language, and mentions to explicit and offensive Hate Groups, as well as in-text references to disturbing and inappropriate content. Sensitive language is censored with ## and **. LAST UPDATED: 21/09/2025 (D/M/Y) (Day/Month/Year) DATES ARE ALL REFORMATTED AS (D/M/Y) UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED Report: Cluurs#3118 (user) Information: Reported for various violations, has commited acts of abuse in the past Action Taken: Bacon Community (a Cluurs Discord) is under investigation Current Status: Unresolved --- Report: Lemonhead#2711 (user) Information: Unfairly banning users for disputing being called gay Current Status: Unresolved --- Report: Pop Server Information: Server hosting Admin Abuse, Mod Abuse, Unfair Muting, and Chat Censorship Current Status: Mostly Resolved, problems were fixed a few times and then the server died --- Report: RexYT Gaming Lounge Information: Vague Wording of Rule Action Taken: Warning Sent to Admins Current Status: Resolved ---04/05/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: OneGodvoRTex MC bedrock server Information: Vague Wording of Rule Action Taken: Warning Sent to Admins Current Status: Resolved ---13/06/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Ozura Community Information: Kicked Upon Notice Action Taken: None available Current Status: Failure --- Report: SuperSurvival3 Information: Kicked Unfairly Action Taken: Contacted Owner Current Status: Resolved ---10/08/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: SuperSurvival Information: User Kicked Unfairly Action Taken: Contacted Owner Current Status: Resolved ---12/08/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Cluurs Roblox World Information: Bot Unfairly Punishing Members, Practically Secret Rules Being Enforced Unfairly Action Taken: Contacted Owner Current Status: Resolved ---13/08/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Cluurs Roblox World Information: Multiple Reports of Owner Abuse Action Taken: Mods Turned Against The Server Current Status: Raided by separate discord for some reason, Cluurs Roblox World was then shut down. ---13/08/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: N#gus Information: Admin Abuse against Furries, All accounts banned without warning Action Taken: None Current Status: Unresolved ---14/08/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Viking's Flat Earth Community Server Information: Multiple reports of Admin Abuse, Main Account Unfairly Banned Action Taken: None Current Status: Unresolved ---22/08/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Foodist Vibe Zone Information: Reported for cases of abuse, harassment, trolling, and hate. Action Taken: Contacted multiple Admins, Mods, and the Owner Current Status: Partly Resolved ---22/08/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Uganda Information: Random Inspection Action Taken: Contacted Owner Current Status: No Problems Solved, Inspection Passed ---23/08/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Foodist Vibe Zone Information: An account was banned for little reason, abuse? Action Taken: None Current Status: False Alarm, Resolved Report: Jeyzex Planet Information: Possible Nitro Scam, testing is being done to determine legitimacy. Action Taken: Test being conducted Current Status: Unresolved ---24/08/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Pet Sim X Forest Information: Multiple members accusing it of Fraud and violating Discord's TOS. Action Taken: To be reported to Discord for violation of Discord TOS. Current Status: Unresolved ---26/08/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: TOTAL GAMING Information: Possible Admin Abuse Found Action Taken: Contacted Reporter of Abuse for further info Current Status: Unresolved ---26/08/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Universe Information: Possible Abuse of Power Action Taken: Contacted Owner Current Status: Resolved ---27/08/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: AspiriaMC Information: Blatent Abuse of Power Action Taken: Contacted Owner, not cooperating Current Status: Irrelevant, server raided by rogue member of the AAR. ---30/08/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Universe Information: Owner Abusive Action Taken: Contacted Owner Current Status: Resolved ---02/09/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Jeyzex Planet Information: Possible Nitro Scam, testing is being done to determine legitimacy. Action Taken: Reported for Violation of Discord TOS, likely taken down Current Status: Resolved Report: Jeyzex Galaxy Information: Possible Nitro Scam, testing is being done to determine legitimacy. Action Taken: Reported for Violation of Discord TOS, likely to be taken down Current Status: Resolved (mainly) ---11/09/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Universe Information: User Abusive (Poutineka) User tried to report member of Discord to ZuriProto (The owner of a discord server) to try and stop him from getting mod Action Taken: Contacted ZuriProto Current Status: Resolved Report: Bacon Community Information: Possible Abuse of various types Action Taken: Investigation Underway, Action Done Current Status: Unresolved ---12/09/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Universe Information: ZuriProto unfairly banned Action Taken: Contacted admins and owner Current Status: Resolved ---12/09/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: The Existence Realm Information: Users allegedly unfairly demoted Action Taken: Contacted admins and owner Current Status: Resolved, False Alarm Report: Jeyzex Rewards Information: Possible Nitro Scam for Invites Action Taken: Reported for Violation of Discord TOS, likely to be taken down Current Status: Resolved (mainly) ---17/09/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Bitcoin Heroes Information: Alleged promotion of spam and DM advertising by multiple users. Action Taken: Contacted Owner, reported for violation of TOS. Current Status: Resolved (mainly) ---19/09/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Wolf Nation Gaming Information: Banned user for self promotion in self-promotion channel Action Taken: None Current Status: Resolved ---20/09/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Server Of ImCadezxYT Information: Banned User for Little Reason Action Taken: Mods went against server Current Status: Resolved (mainly) ---21/09/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Wolf Nation Gaming Information: Banned user for self promotion in self-promotion channel AGAIN Action Taken: None Current Status: Resolved ---21/09/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Quiden Modern Warriors Information: Blatant Admin Abuse Action Taken: None Current Status: Resolved, abusive user banned ---25/09/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: SIMP SERVER Information: Alleged Admin Abuse Action Taken: Server Inspected, false report Current Status: Resolved, False Report ---26/09/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Furry Hunting Association Information: Harassment, spamming in DMs Action Taken: Reported for Violation of TOS Current Status: Resolved, Server Shut Down ---01/10/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Fluffy Abyss Information: Alleged Mod Abuse Action Taken: None Current Status: Unresolved Report: Fluffy Abyss Information: Broken Verification System Action Taken: Contacted Owner Current Status: Unresolved ---01/10/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Chick-Fil-A Information: Harassment Action Taken: Contacted Admin (Who may be owner) Current Status: Unresolved ---11/10/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Doge Server Information: Unfair Muting Action Taken: Contacted Admin (owner jr) Current Status: Unresolved ---12/10/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: TNT Debates Information: Alleged Admin Abuse, TOS Violation Action Taken: Reported to Discord Staff Current Status: Resolved, server shut down ---13/10/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: TNT's safe hangout Information: Alleged Admin Abuse, TOS Violation Action Taken: Reported to Discord Staff Current Status: Resolved, server shut down Report: TNT Debates 2.0 Information: Alleged Admin Abuse, TOS Violation Action Taken: Reported to Discord Staff Current Status: Unresolved ---14/10/2021 (D/M/Y) TIMESTAMP: 43 REPORTS ---14/10/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Kisses Klub Information: TOS Violation, Underage Dating Action Taken: Reported to Discord Staff Current Status: Resolved ---14/10/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Roblox Halloween Rewards Information: TOS Violation, Spamming and Mass Inviting Action Taken: Reported to Discord Staff Current Status: Resolved, Server Shut Down ---14/10/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: The K##k Kingdom Information: TOS Violation, Underage Dating Action Taken: Reported to Discord Staff Current Status: Resolved, Shut Down ---15/10/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: The Lonelys Information: TOS Violation, Underage Dating Action Taken: Reported to Discord Staff Current Status: Resolved ---18/10/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: Discord Halloween Rewards Information: TOS Violation, Spamming and Mass Inviting Action Taken: Reported to Discord Staff Current Status: Unresolved ---24/11/2021 (D/M/Y) Report: L#li Fandom Information: TOS Violation Action Taken: Reported to Discord Staff Current Status: Resolved, Server Shut Down --- Report: MemeDonator#1204 Information: Repeated Mod Abuse against @Deleted User#0000 by deleting advertisements Current Status: Unresolved --- Report: Panad#6899 Information: Transphobic Insults and Racial Slur Use Action Taken: Banned from Server and Minecraft Server presence Current Status: Resolved --- Report: Panadull Threats (users Panad#6899 and null#7662) Information: Transphobic Insults and Racial Slur Use, Excessive Harassment and Breaking of Minecraft Server Rules Action Taken: Both users banned from Server and Minecraft Server presence, Null successfully reported to Discord Current Status: Resolved --- Report: Poutineka#0181 (user) Information: Abuse and Harassment, Admin Abuse, Conspiring against the AAR Action Taken: Placed on Watchlist, no problems since Current Status: Under Watch --- Report: Anti Abuse Center (server) Information: Previously promoted Raiding and Harassment Action Taken: Server Reported, Server Taken Down Current Status: Resolved, Server Taken Down --- Report: Universe / THE SILENT GALAXY (server) Information: Owned by a user who promotes Raiding Action Taken: Server Reported to Discord, then later problem was fixed Current Status: Shared with Larger Report --- Report: Kindel Situation (user kindel342#1111 Alt Names: kindel322#5108 and Freedom#4324) Information: Admin Abuse, Attempted to get innocent user demoted, using Alts to stop himself from being banned off Discord Action Taken: Reported to Discord (along with alt accounts), Banned from servers, then later problem was fixed Current Status: Resolved, Not a Threat Anymore -- Report: Wolf Nation Gaming (server) Information: Reported in the past for promoting Anti Furry Harassment Current Status: Resolved --- Report: Zyeraz trash house (server) Information: Admin Abuse, Promotion of Harassment; Hateful, Racist, and Discriminatory Language Action Taken: Messages Reported Current Status: Shared with Larger Report --- Report: zyeraz#4556 (user) Information: Harassment, Toxicity, Admin Abuse, Owner of Zyeraz Trash House, helped with XLPS4 Doxxing Threats Action Taken: Messages Reported Current Status: Unresolved --- Report: Blebcord Doxxing Threats (users/servers) Report: Doxxing Threats made by XLPS4, Zyeraz, and Null (XLPS4#6545, zyeraz#4556, Null#4692 AKA (oe233#4692) AKA polygon#3022 - 861346227387105331) Action Taken: Exposé Documents Published, Users Reported, XLPS4's Account was disabled for 7 days Current Status: Unresolved --- Report: Rick astley#7228 Raid Threats (user) Information: Threats of Raiding, Hateful Conduct Action Taken: Banned from Direct Alliance Servers Current Status: Partially Resolved --- Report: Ditpo ッ#2605 (user) Information: Anti-Alliance, Anti AAR Action Done: Blacklisted Current Status: Partially Resolved --- Report: Grey Fox#9351 (user) Information: Possible P##ophile (not certain) Current Status: Unresolved --- Report: ant#1611 - 421425681944281098 (user) Information: Possible Admin Abuse Current Status: Unresolved --- Report: boda#3777 - 530964580218699787 (user) Information: Raiding, Spamming Current Status: Resolved, Reported to Discord --- Report: ACA Bowser's Empire Debacle (server) Users: Users Littlepuppy202#7672 / LP202#7672 and Troller_gipsy757#6549 Information: Participant in raid server ACA or Bowsers Empire Current Status: Resolved, problem is fixed --- Report: The Bitcher Detector#1507, ID: 1032852146116370433 (user) Information: Raiding, leader of multiple raid groups, I have encountered him before Alt: Bitchless Detector#7949 Current Status: Partially Resolved, Some Owned Servers have been Taken Down --- Report: Warrior Debacle (users) Information: User by the name of Warrior667 is the owner of the United Coalition Raid Group Username and Alt Accounts: Warrior667#7460 / Warrior667#9952 / Warrior667#6851 / Warrior667#1825 User ID: 1058066106272718928 / 1109496319741005895 / 1112751981962993694 / 1115743447769436281 More IDs: 1058066106272718928 / 1109496319741005895 / 1112751981962993694 / 1115743447769436281 More Usernames: Warrior889#6574 / 1123395166645002280 / Warrior Alt#8022 / 1125240372596052048 Current Status: Resolved, Main Server and 7-20+ Affiliated Servers have been Taken Down (from 2023/07/28 to 2023/08/03) (Y/M/D) --- Report: Not.hecker#9490 (user) Information: Notorious Raider Current Status: No Action Taken --- Report: jordan727 (user) Information: Dox threats against jimmybob / TonyTCB, affiliated with the SOC Raid Group (Servers since taken down) User ID : 1094488226368073858 Current Status: Resolved, Dox Threats Failed, Servers they reside in were Taken Down, Messages Reported --- Report: SOC Raid Server Blacklist (user blacklist) Information: Users Present on SOC Raid Server Users #1: (.rhodesiaspride - ID: 1118615093006041261), (._buddyyyy. / _buddyyyy.#0 - ID: 858613867398823946), (rat_champion7324 - ID: 817604687213625405) Users #2: (DoomBringer#5534 - ID: 1125035944295288832), (『AE』 𐰅 αℓєχ’ĦуρєяᎶᎶ 𐰅 【CG】╠LⲐϯΔ╣#7718 - ID: 1017191302267408444) Users #3: (norwegian.quantumpp - ID: 1116069082878451854), (.rhodesiaspride - ID: 1118615093006041261), (jordan727 - ID: 1094488226368073858) Current Status: Partially Resolved, Server has been Taken Down, jordan727 problem was resolved --- Report: United Coalition / CG Chaos Raiding Groups (server blacklist) Information: Multiple servers calling themselves United Coalition, SOC Raiding Server, CG Chaos, etc. host raiding, harassment, and Anti-LGBTQ Propaganda Users #2: Reports are done to Eurasia Anti Gacha Union and United Coalition servers, as well as: SOC Raiding Server, The N.N.O. Users #3: Sovereign Albanian Imperium, The OFN Reborn, Packgod Affiliates, N#zi Deutsches Reich... Action Taken: A large group of servers were reported to Discord, 5 servers at leastwere successfully taken down. Its possible more servers were taken down too. Current Status: Resolved, Servers Taken Down Successfully --- Report: Anti-Furry Server Takedown (servers) Information: A giant campaign is taken against a collection of Anti-Furry Raid Servers. Info #2: Servers include: Integralist Overseeing Worker's Party, GERMAN IRON ORDER (alt invites too), SOC AMITRATHY (alt invites too), United Coalition (alt invites too), Info #3: Eurasia Anti Gacha UNion, c00lk1ds Main Hub, Anti-Furry Base, Anti Furry Central Hub, Anti Furry Alliance Bunker, The anti furry official discord server Info #4: Anti-Furry Coalition, Anti-Furry hideout, ARSE Anti Raiding Server Establishment, Gasmask Legion, The Sovereign Affliction, etc. Action Taken: 7+ Servers are taken down, it's possible 20+ were taken down as well. Current Status: Mostly Resolved, Servers Taken Down Successfully --- Report: UTTP Server Takedown (servers) Information: A large swave of UTTP servers, (UTubeTrollPolice), they are all harassment servers engaged in raiding, trolling, doxxing, hateful conduct, and Anti-LGBTQ propaganda Servers: UTTP Servers, ANTI FNAF(tm) UTUBE, LZTP | Loafzoid's TrollPolice, EMPIRE OF DROPBOX [ANTI-DEGEN], CREPNESTMAN EMPIRE (Official) and others Action Taken: Servers Reported to Discord Successfully, 8/11 servers are taken down. Miscellanious campaigns give 6/15 servers taken down. Current Status: Resolved --- Report: 148 Server Takedown (servers) Information: A user by the name of Roach148 leads raiding and doxxing groups. An alliance with the Civilian Safety Service server begins a campaign to take down his servers. Action Taken: 6/8 Targeted Servers were Taken Down Successfully, more is planned of this Current Status: Partially Resolved, 148 appears to have disappeared --- Report: Recent UTTP Takedowns (servers) Information: Servers are discovered hosting UTTP Propaganda and Raiding, original UTTP server link replaced with FriendsHub, a disguised troll server Servers: ZeNesantTrollPolice@2025, 148 Marine Corps, EvolveExterminationCult, SKITTLES HATER POLICE, KKTK Revival 2025 (Operation Egypt Fall) Action Taken: List of servers are Reported to Discord Current Status: Resolved, Servers Taken Down Successfully --- Report: UTTP Troll Order States++ Information: Servers discovered as UTTP raiding servers and affiliated servers Servers: Troll Police Order State (And gateway server), gateway server #2, fishy resistance cartel bunker, HTTPS Official, N*GROTECH-HQ, Sovereign Unaki Action Taken: Servers have been Reported to Discord Current Status: Resolved --- jimmybob / TonyTCB — 2025-01-31 02:21 PM (Y/M/D) Report: The Resistance Collection Information: Multiple servers found by a group named The Resistance, hosting Anti-LGBT, Homophobic, P###philic, and Zoophilic promotion Servers: Angel's Anti-LGBT Server and 1337, and the private server related to it Action Taken: Invites gathered, ready to be reported soon Current Status: Resolved, most servers shut down --- Report: Kitty Club P#do Server Information: Server hosts minors trying to contact p###philes and putting themselves in danger. Servers: Kittyclub Action Taken: Invites gathered, reported to Discord. Current Status: Expired --- Report: /angel P#do Server Information: Server hosts minors and suspected p###philes. Servers: /angel Action Taken: Invites gathered, requires reporting via an alt account as their verification requires answering questions about "MAPS". Current Status: Expired --- Report: AFF Servers Information: Multiple servers working as hate groups and hackers against communities. Servers: AFF Portal gateway server, Anti-Furry Division Gateway, The Raider's Syndicate / RSK-S.S.A RS Kiralysaga Action Taken: Invites gathered, to be reported. Current Status: Resolved --- TonyTCB / jimmybob — 2025-06-17 01:29 PM (Y/M/D) Report: YouTube Farm Gang Army Information: Server hosts hatespeech, glorification of violence, racist propaganda, offensive language, harassment Servers: YouTube Farm Gang Army Action Taken: Invites gathered, to be reported. Current Status: Server Reported to Discord --- TonyTCB / jimmybob — 2025-07-02 05:15 PM (Y/M/D) Report: Random UTTP Servers Information: Servers engage in Spam and Abuse. Servers: TFK Fartknockia, The Grand Empire Action Taken: Invites gathered, reported, shut down. Current Status: Resolved --- Report: Kitty Club P#do Server Information: Server hosts minors trying to contact p##ophiles and putting themselves in danger. Servers: Kittyclub Action Taken: Invites gathered, reported to Discord. Current Status: Expired --- Report: /angel P#do Server Information: Server hosts minors and suspected p##ophiles. Servers: /angel Action Taken: Invites gathered, requires reporting via an alt account as their verification requires answering questions about "MAPS". Current Status: Expired --- Report: AFF Servers Information: Multiple servers working as hate groups and hackers against communities. Servers: AFF Portal gateway server, Anti-Furry Division Gateway, The Raider's Syndicate / RSK-S.S.A RS Kiralysaga Action Taken: Invites gathered, to be reported. Current Status: Resolved --- TonyTCB / jimmybob — 2025-06-17 01:29 PM (Y/M/D) Report: YouTube Farm Gang Army Information: Server hosts hatespeech, glorification of violence, racist propaganda, offensive language, harassment Servers: YouTube Farm Gang Army Action Taken: Invites gathered, to be reported. Current Status: Server Reported to Discord --- Report: Major UTTP Espionage Information: Campaign taken through intense spying against a UTTP server. UTTP Member named Zytherox, known as "the biggest groomer of UTTP history" got house arrest after being infiltrated by the FBI. Investigator TimModelsStuff helped with the police report against Zytherox. Servers: Empire, The deviantart duck division, "j#wish lifes dont matter", "anti degeneracy police force Action Taken: Infiltrated, and Reported. Current Status: Ongoing ---21/09/2025 (D/M/Y)
- The Movy Chronicles | TC Blox Studios
Watch the show The Movy Chronicles right from our Website! See Movy, Marcus, Spee, Rajiv, Emily, Ted, Buford, and Herman in an Indie Cartoon Show by TC Blox Studios Barket Market Usage of The Movy Chronicles is subject to the Content Licens e . The Movy Chronicles The Movy Chronicles Play Video Share Whole Channel This Video Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Copy Link Link Copied Now Playing 36:58 Play Video Laser Beams! - The Movy Chronicles - Season 1 Episode 1 ✔ | TC Blox Studios Now Playing 51:31 Play Video Movy at The Movies - The Movy Chronicles - Season 1 Episode 2 ✔ (REUPLOAD) | TC Blox Studios Now Playing 19:38 Play Video Chaos On Kleyklay - The Movy Chronicles - Season 1 Episode 3 ✔️ | TC Blox Studios
- Anti-Abuse Principle | TC Blox Studios
Back to Home Details Step-by-Step Guide Philosophy Menu More Anti-Abuse Principle [Full Text] ---Bridging Consequentialism and Deontology--- From the value of interests, we can bridge consequentialism and deontology, and derive a universal deontological principle true in all circumstances that is entirely consistent with the Fulfillment of Interests as a value as derived from Justification Ethics, Value Reductionism, and the Absolute Interest Conclusion. To do this in a way that is more versatile, we can uncover how certain actions may subtly constitute interest-frustration. ---Interest Alignment and Kantian Ethics--- A major part of Kantian Ethics, the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, is the idea that people should be treated as an end in themselves and never merely as a means. This idea’s usefulness can be derived if we value people’s interests. If someone is treated as a means to someone else’s end, that means whatever actions are done are not done in respect to the person’s interests. Said another way, their interests are not respected. This violates the fulfillment of interests directly, as the respect of people’s interests is necessary to ensure people’s interests are not simply ignored, or treated with a bare minimum of care. To act in a way that cannot be rationally justified relative to the other person's interests or preferences, and cannot be justified relative to interests themselves, is fundamentally contradictory with interests as the grounding of normative value. We can expand upon this into a broader idea of Interest Alignment, where interactions and contracts between people are only truly ethical if the people involved have aligned interests; ensuring they are all mutually benefiting from the contract. It is in this way that Interest Alignment to a reasonable extent, explains the value of Consent, as it can only be achieved through enthusiastic, informed consent among the parties involved. ---Consent--- Consent is a continuous, preferably enthusiastic, explicit, and relevantly-informed, acceptance of an agreement, contract, or activity. Preferably enthusiastic here means you not only should have an interest in signing a contract, or accepting an agreement, but you also ought to enthusiastically approve of each term of the contract, every part or at least the most important parts of the agreement or activity. Relevantly-informed means that you know what you are agreeing to and have the knowledge required, to a reasonable and relevant extent, to meaningfully judge the agreement's outcomes relative to your own interests. The reason these things are valuable, the reason consent is a useful 'construct' at all, if it can even be denegrated to a mere construct, is because it is necessary to ensure interactions between people respect their interests. If people's interests are not aligned at all, I.E. they are all acting in respect to only their own individual interests, then they will end up frustrating against each-others interests. Relative to interests as a value, this is contradictory with the idea that interests are meaningful at all. It is for this reason that Consent, even if it is defined as a mere construct, is surely the most valuable, universal, and important construct. This is also the reason why behaviors that function off of misaligned interests, that may result in frustration for one side of a deal, can be so dangerous to the meaning of consent and interests itself. This, is the definition of Abuse. ---Rational Interests take priority over Irrational Interests--- Four ruffians break into your house, what the devil? As you grab your powdered wig and Kentucky rifle, blow a golfball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw your pistol on the second man, misses him entirely because it's smoothbore, and have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grapeshot, "Tally ho, lads!" The grapeshot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Self-defense is rationally justifiable, as your defense of yourself is an inherent and rational interest relative to your own self-interest, and their interest in killing or seriously hurting you is irrational as it is not inherent and is instead arbitrary. You are contradicting their interests in not being killed, but they are contradicting the interest of not being killed as well. You are merely defending yourself while defending rationality itself. It is justifiable as long as it is rational to act according to an inherent and non-arbitrary interest in contradiction with the relevant interests of an irrational actor, while the irrational actor contradicts their own relevant interests. This begs the question of what qualifies as consistent? Consistent relative to what, all sentient beings' interests? Which interests must be the most inherent and rational interests, as clearly it is irrational to act relative to the standard that 1+1=3, even if everybody has an interest in asserting that. The most rational standard thus must be based on the most inherent and rational interests, and the protection of them. Murderers valuing their own lives is an irrational, contradictory interest. It is an interest with some value, but of less value than the interest of someone acting otherwise entirely consistently with the value of interests and/or Justification Ethics. Therefore: Killing ruffians in self-defense is rationally justifiable because your rational inherent interests are of more value than the contradictory interests of the ruffians, and thus your interests are more relevant to whatever utmost rational standard of value selected. This comes from the recognition that rational interests take priority over irrational interests. Based on these arguments, irrational frustration can be said to involve acting in a way that is not aligned with the rational interests of others. Acting in alignment with rational interests, is thus utmost rational, and defense of those rational interests against rationality is also itself rational. Note as well that inherently interest-frustrating conduct is measured according to the standard that such conduct results in interest-frustrating by way of either interest misalignment, or otherwise, in most circumstances regardless of external factors to a reasonable extent, by the definition of "inherent harms". With these considerations, can be crafted the following principle of Yogg Law: —The Anti-Abuse Principle (AAP)— Actions that constitute interference with another's non-abusive fulfillment of their own inherent and non-contradictory interests, are illegitimate. Actions that inherently result in the frustration of interests, through overall frustration by misalignment of interests between parties, or due to conduct that frustrates against inherent interests, are unjustifiable, constitute ‘abuse’, and are thus illegitimate. Actions that prevent abuse, or inhibit otherwise unjustifiable conduct; including conduct that is a product of interest misalignment between parties, and conduct that is inherently frustrating to interests; are legitimate as they constitute resistance to abuse. This principle can be stated in essence in a simple sentence: "Do what you want, unless it stops others from doing what they want, unless it constitutes proportionate defense against the latter." Consent
- Content for Minecraft | TC Blox Studios
Worlds, Skins, Mods, and Addons made for various versions of Minecraft, created by TC Blox Studios. Help contribute by applying for a Partnership! Content for Minecraft (we are not affiliated with Mojang Studios or Microsoft ) Want to help contribute? Apply for Partnership Java and Bedrock worlds are available Minecraft Worlds Worlds made for Minecraft: Bedrock Edition aka Windows 10 Edition aka Minecraft For Windows Java + Bedrock Minecraft Skins Skins made for Minecraft, work on Java and Bedrock. Java Edition Only Minecraft Mods Mods for Minecraft: Java Edition 1.14.4 Bedrock Edition Only Minecraft Addons Addons made for Minecraft: Bedrock Edition aka Windows 10 Edition aka Minecraft for Windows (compatibility is scarce, some things may not work) Bedrock Edition Only Minecraft Texture Packs Resource Packs made for Minecraft: Bedrock Edition aka Windows 10 Edition aka Minecraft for Windows Apply for Partnership and help Contribute
- Yoggism | TC Blox Studios
Yoggism, also called Yogg Interest Theory, is a philosophical framework based on the idea that the Fulfillment of Interests is the ultimate value. Home Step-by-Step Guide Conclusions Theories Implications Concepts Philosophy Menu More Anti-Abuse Principle Justification Ethics Inherent Interest Theory Normative Will More Conclusions Theories Implications Yoggism - Yogg Interest Theory Yoggism, aka Yogg Interest Theory, is an individualist philosophical framework built on the Fulfillment of Interests as the source of Ethics. Interests as a value is justified as being necessary for the deduction of normative claims. This concept is called Justification Ethics . Acts that stop beings from doing what they want, and interfere with one's interests, are illegitimate. Defense of interests is the imperative. --Content Usage-- The Texts, Theories, Ideas, and Info Post ers present on this page, relating to Yoggism, can be freely redistributed with credit to TonyTCB . Page Version: v5.4.0 Details of the Theory - Info Posters Yogg Interest Theory, is the idea that the Fulfillment of Interests, with priority to Inherent Interests, and the defense against Inherently Frustrating Interests, is the most justifiable and universal normative standard that can be defined. It is the logical consequence of Justification Ethics , the idea that accepting the need to rationally justify normative claims presupposes interests as the source of value, as due to the is/ought gap, not logic nor norms nor mere facts can derive normative claims. To reject justification is thus to forfeit all normative force. Inherent Interests as priority is justified by Inherent Interest Theory . Inherent Interests are defined as interests that act as a conduit of other interests, that are casually connected to the capacity to fulfill other interests; I.E. they are intrinsically foundational to interests. Below is a slideshow containing 'Info Posters' that explain overviews of different parts of the philosophy. Step-by-Step Guide Yoggism has various sections that act as justification and answers to different questions of how the framework works. Basic Definitions:: 1. Interest - A preference / goal, that which a sentient being's behavior tends towards. 2. Inherent Interest - An interest that acts as a conduit for other interests, other fundamental interests depend upon it. 3. Normative Will - The capacity for normative and rational claims to be evaluate-able; aka ethical agency. 4. Abusive Interests - Interests that enforce through misaligned interests, active frustration/violation of inherent interests. Anti-Abuse Principle - The core principle of Yoggism, that unjustifiable frustration against inherent interests is illegitimate. [see overview] www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text1_anti-abuse-principle Justification Ethics - The justification for why Interests as a Value is presupposed by any attempt to rationally justify normative claims. [see overview] www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text2_justification-ethics Inherent Interest Theory - The basis of how interests are weighed against each-other, and how 'Inherent Interests' act as conduits for other interests. [see overview] www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text9_inherent-interest-theory Retaliatory Law - Justification of Self-Defense, of defense of inherent interests over 'abusive' interests. www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text6_retaliatory-law Normative Will - This theory justifies what kind of life the framework applies to. Yoggism grants all sentient beings value through Interests. [see overview] www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text5_normative-will --Implications of Yoggism-- Markets and Interest Alignment [see full text] - How Worker-Owned Cooperatives are more Ethical and Prosperous as they allow greater Interest Alignment and prevent abuse via the AAP Omnilibertarian Communities [see full text] - How Private Communities have a duty of Fairness to all members, and how Yoggism prescribes True Individualist Freedom in all domains Environmentalism from Interests [coming soon] - How Entanglement of Interests generate environmental rights and justify anti-pollution sentiment via individualism better than the NAP Interest Property Theory [see full text] - How a value of Interests implies non-abusive Property Rights Yogg Virtue Theory [see overview] - The art of a Good Character is in Respect of Interests Definition of Inherent Interest (from Inherent Interest Theory ): An interest is more inherent than another if the given interest is entangled with other interests, or acts as a conduit for other interests regardless of external factors; in a way the second interest does not, or to a higher extent. For example, an interest in not having food taken away, can depending on circumstance be a very inherent interest, as it acts as a conduit for an interest in not dying; which itself is a conduit for all other interests. Anti-Abuse Principle (AAP) Actions that constitute interference with another's non-abusive fulfillment of their own inherent and non-contradictory interests, are illegitimate. Actions that inherently result in the frustration of interests, through overall frustration by misalignment of interests between parties, or due to conduct that frustrates against inherent interests, are unjustifiable, constitute ‘abuse’, and are thus illegitimate. Actions that prevent abuse, or inhibit otherwise unjustifiable conduct; including conduct that is a product of interest misalignment between parties, and conduct that is inherently frustrating to interests; are legitimate as they constitute resistance to abuse. --- (Inherent Interests vs. Non-Inherent Interests) Inherent Interests are defined as interests that intrinsically act as a conduit for other interests, interests foundational or causally connected to other interests. --- (Simplified Principle) This principle can be stated in essence in a simple sentence: "Do what you want, unless it stops others from doing what they want, unless it constitutes proportionate defense against the latter." This principle is justified by Justification Ethics . The use of "inherent interest" is derived from Inherent Interest Theory . [see full text] [see justification ethics] [see inherent interest theory] Justification Ethics Justification Ethics is the backbone of Yoggism, used to derive the key parts of the philosophy. The way it works is a step by step exploration of how normative ethical claims can be derived. The overall claim is that rational justification of normative force requires an appeal to the interests of whomever you are interacting with. Types of Premises The different kinds of premises that can be used to derive claims are: 1. Truth Claims (true facts about the world, is-statements) 2. Reason (logical truths, A=A, if A implies B and A is true then B is true, I think therefore I am) 3. Interests (wants, desires, preferences, goals; of some sentient being) 4. Axioms (assumptions, statements assumed to be true without justification) 5. Presuppositions (norms presupposed by things actors are already doing) Is-Ought Gap limits Normative Proofs Is-Statements (the sky is blue) cannot be used to derive Ought-Statements (you ought not break a chair). This is called the is-ought gap and it is a logical consequence of deduction, it gives a fundamental limitation to how normative claims can be proven. Normative claims, being ought statements, thus cannot be derived from Truth Claims, or pure Reason. The only exception is arguments that don't prove ethical claims, but only rational claims like "1+1=2". For ethical claims, only Interests and Axioms work. Interests are the Only Option But even here, axioms cannot be used as the core for the rational justification of normative force because you cannot prove someone else "rationally ought to accept X claim" if they do not accept your axiom. Axioms are by definition unprovable, they are assumptions. Interests though, can be used to prove normative claims. Imagine you want to prove your friend "ought to buy a washing machine". This can be as simple as appealing to their interest in clean clothes. Therefore, only Interests can be used to prove normative claims. Definitions: Justification: Proving an action justifiable means to form a deductive argument that derives a claim in the form "you ought to accept X". Such a deductive argument only proves justification if the conclusion is derived from premises that apply to the person you're justifying the action to; for if they don't then the conclusion cannot follow. Normative Claim: For the purposes of this text, the claims used are not simple normative truths like "you ought to accept 1+1=2" but rather something like "you ought not steal". Normative Justification: A deductive argument (or argument equivalent to a deduction) that derives a claim in the form "you ought to accept X". [see full text] [see deduction] [see yoggism as a procedural norm] Deriving Interest Fulfillment Persuasive Arguments and thus Rational Justification must appeal to Interests Premises of a persuasive argument must be justifiable to the person the ought claim is made to, otherwise the claim could not follow. Rational Justification functions as a persuasive argument, an argument that proves a claim in the form "you ought to accept X" to some opponent. Any argument like this, any 'persuasive argument' at all, must appeal to the interests of the opponent for the opponent to accept the premises; the only exception being arguments that prove claims solely based on rationalism itself. For if the opponent does not accept the premises, the argument will not follow. For example, trying to argue that "you ought to buy a washing machine" must appeal to the interests of the opponent. Rational Justification must appeal to the Normative Value of Interests Normative claims cannot be derived purely through non-normative premises. If a claim is truely normative, that normativity has to come from premises that are justifiable. Persuasive Arguments, and thus Rational Justification, is only meaningful if it proves a normative claim "you ought to accept X". The normativity of the claim must be derived from the premises of the argument, and those premises must appeal to the interests of the opponent. Therefore, as a premise of any act of rational justification, the normative value of the opponent's interests must be appealed to. Interactions should be Rationally Justifiable If you act in a way where your behavior is rationally unjustifiable, you are being irrational. Any semblance of reason would thus discredit such behavior. If you interact with someone, you should be able to rationally justify your interaction, in a way where those involved in the interaction should be rationally required to accept your justification. This means you should be able to justify that the claim “You rationally ought to accept my way of interacting is reasonable” is true for the person you are interacting with; you should be able to argue you are acting reasonably. To contradict the value of Interests is to contradict Rational Justification Interactions that contradict the normative value of interests, fail to be rationally justifiable to those engaged in the interaction. This is a 'persuasive argument', meaning an argument that attempts to derive a claim in the form "You ought to accept X". Any argument in this form, must appeal to the interests of any debate opponent for the conclusion to have valid normative weight. To engage in an interaction that is inconsistent with the normative value of interest, is to engage in an interaction that cannot be rationally justified to anyone. Imagine someone is outside of your house and is dancing weirdly on the sidewalk. Not too close to your house to disturb your yard, not making much noise, either. They just.. look weird, and you can see them being weird out of your window. Imagine you have an interest in them not doing that. Said another way, you don't like that they are doing that. What is more reasonable relative to the Fulfillment of Interests? A. To forcibly stop the person from doing what they want. B. To close your window so them dancing stops getting on your nerves. Inherent Interest Theory --A Definition of Inherent Interest-- Inherentness is a spectrum used to compare interests. An interest is more inherent than another if the given interest is entangled with other interests, or acts as a conduit for other interests regardless of external factors; in a way the second interest does not, or to a higher extent. For example, an interest in not having food taken away, can in most circumstances be a very inherent interest, as it acts as a conduit for an interest in not dying; which itself is a conduit for all other interests. --Action Spectrum-- Different actions carry more or less justificatory burden based on how much the action interferes with interests, and whether that interference is intrinsic to the contents of the action itself. This creates a spectrum between action and inaction and is logically necessary as the rejection of this spectrum makes neutrality and inaction collapse as distinctions, and allows the derivation of contradictory claims. [see full text] Normative Will A water bottle cannot behave irrationally, the distinction of rational behavior and irrational behavior does not apply to it. A water bottle's behavior can only be measured relative to the laws of physics themselves. Sentient beings can act rationally and irrationally though, relative to their interests and relative to the value of truth. The Normative Will of sentient beings is the difference in volition and capacity to resist instinct, the capacity to act rationally or irrationally relative to rational standards and relative to one's own interests, and the capacity to contradict naturally selected preferences. Through Justification Ethics, we can derive that all sentient beings have normative value. Definition: Normative Will is therefore the capacity for normative evaluation of behaviors relative to standards beyond the mere laws of physics; including rationality, ethics, and personal preferences. [see full text] Implications How it connects to Justification Ethics Justification Ethics is the idea that rational justification presupposes an appeal to the Normative Value of Interests themselves. If you interact with a water bottle, you need not justify your actions to the water bottle, because rationally justifying a claim of "this water bottle ought to accept X idea" makes no sense. The water bottle is not a rational actor at any level. For sentient beings this isn't true. Consider the interaction of "I will steal this child's candy". How can you rationally justify such an interaction? The child would object, and the child's cognition should be complex enough to be able to judge the action on rational grounds, thus the objection is of rational weight. Thus, rational justification requires you to be able to prove "the child ought rationally to accept my interaction as non-contradictory". This is impossible, because you cannot: 1. Prove it's positively rational to steal candy based on rationalism alone, with no explicit or implicit appeal to normative value. 2. Prove it's legitimate to steal candy relative to the normative value of Interests, as the action is inherently frustrating and without reason. Therefore, stealing candy from a child is rationally unjustifiable. Therefore, Normative Will is the way to measure how strictly Justification Ethics applies. Animal Rights through Justification Justification Ethics, which implies the Normative Value of Interests, can apply to any sentient being where their cognition is complex enough to judge a given action on rational grounds, relative to the standards or complexity of the action and it's affects. In the "stealing candy from a child" example, the child's cognition is complex enough such that you can derive the normative claim "they rationally ought to disapprove of you stealing from them" is true for the child, relative to their interests. Likewise, you can't derive they rationally ought to accept your behavior. Similar logic applies to animals, you can simply replace "child" with "monkey/dog/bird/earthworm" and it's fine. Those beings do have the ability to act rationally and irrationally relative to their interests, and relative to how they should act relative to truth. Since preference is present in all sentient beings, normative claims can be derivable through an appeal to their interests. If you try to kill a dog for no reason other than you want to, it is impossible to make an argument such that "the dog ought rationally to accept your interaction as non-contradictory". This is impossible, because you cannot: 1. Prove it's positively rational to harm the dog based on rationalism alone, with no explicit or implicit appeal to normative value. 2. Prove it's legitimate to harm the dog relative to the normative value of Interests, as the action is inherently frustrating and without reason. Since normative claims involving the dog must appeal to their interests, and acting to hurt the dog is inherently frustrating, such actions are unjustifiable. Absolute Interest Conclusion Proven It has thus been shown that Normative Will is the appropriate measure on how strictly Justification Ethics applies. Killing a dog is unjustifiable because normative claims involving them must appeal to interests, same with killing a monkey, or a child, or a cow, or a human. The logical consequence of this is that any entity that is sentient with Interests, has Justification Ethics apply to it to the rational extent. Any unnecessary inherent frustration of their interests is thus illegitimate as it cannot be justified without appealing either to factual and purely rational premises, which doesn't work, or appealing to the Normative Value of Interests by trying to appeal to their own standards, which contradict the claim trying to be proven, thus justification fails. Therefore, the Fulfillment of Interests of all sentient beings, in all reference frames; with priority to Inherent, Rational Interests, as a value, is sustained. [see Absolute Interest Conclusion overview] Yogg Virtue Theory Yogg Virtue Theory is the idea that the definition of a Good Character or Good Virtue is founded on the Respect for Interests, and behaviors that curate this respect, are good. This grants the Yogg Virtue Principle : You ought to act in a way consistent with the virtues that curate respect for interests, including Mutual Respect, Justice, Truth, and Recognition of others as Self-Sovereign. You ought to not act against Consent, or enforce Interest Misalignment for your own gain through Unfairness, Irrationality, Explotativeness, or Abuse. You ought to form a character that adheres to the responsibility of upholding these character traits, against Negligence towards others, and Abuse of others. Common virtues such as Justice, Self-Sovereignty, and Generosity, are simply emergent properties of the Respect for Interests. The idea of Virtue is a great way of explaining how inaction can be morally wrong. Specifically if someone does not act to save someone and lets someone come to harm, the justification of calling that a moral wrong, is difficult under Justification Ethics, Justification Ethics is contingent on the normative obligation to rationally justify methods of interaction. If there is no interaction occurring, it's not obvious how there could be an obligation to rationally justify inaction, or even how such justification could happen, and to whom. Praxeological Asymmetry could also be used to argue for inaction not needing justification, based on the epistemic logic of there being a default state of falsity for any positive claim, thus disbelief in something can be excused simply by the lack of evidence, though a true lack of evidence in all directions implies neutrality, violating this asymmetry. Virtue Ethics, specifically built around the Respect for Interests, solves these problems. Virtue Ethics is a philosophical approach emphasizing character and virtue, rather than adherence towards a principle or goal. Positive traits, Virtues, and negative traits, Vices, are the attributes that help curate morally positive and morally negative behavior, respectively. The Anti-Abuse Principle can then be used as an easy way to justify how: 1. Behaviors functioning off of misaligned interests can result in frustration for one side of a deal, which is dangerous, and 2. Respect of Interests in a way similar to Immanuel Kant's "Treat People as an End, never as a Mere Means" is a good way of describing how to prevent such abuse from occurring. These are the justification for Yogg Virtue Theory and it's utility. [see full text] Absolute Interest Conclusion It is utmost rational to uphold the fulfillment of interests of all sentient beings, across all possible reference frames; with priority to existent, rational, inherent interests , as a value. This conclusion is justified by rational justification itself via Justification Ethics , Normative Will , as well as the idea that the Utmost Rational Outcome for any specific set of sentient beings to approach is the outcome that best upholds the fulfillment of their Interests, where 'Interests' are rational preferences, wants, desires, or goals. It is also justified by an idea called Value Reductionism , wherein any value you have ultimately can be reduced to Interests and thus an implicit value of Interests. Further detail on Inherent Interests and non-inherent interests, is present in Inherent Interest Theory . Therefore, actions that are against the normative value of Interests are self-contradictory. Read Full Text All Texts Guide Oughts from Logic [see full text] Absolute Interest Conclusion [see overview] [see full text] Anti-Abuse Principle [see overview] [see full text] Justification Ethics [see overview] [see full text] [see deduction] Inherent Interest Theory [see full text] Retaliatory Law [see full text] Normative Will [see overview] [see full text] Yogg Virtue Theory [see overview] [see full text] Interest Property Theory [see full text] Markets and Interest Alignment [see full text] Rationally, you ought to utmost-Rationally Fulfill your own Interests, as all beings are acting in accordance with their interests and thus rationally must act utmost-rationally towards their ends. Thus, rational existent interests must have prioritization to the self. The utmost-rational outcome that all sentient beings should align with is that which upholds the Fulfillment of Interests of all sentient beings, in all reference frames; with priority to Inherent, Rational Interests. The distinction of Inherent Interests and non-inherent Interests is derived by Inherent Interest Theory . Thus, from the AIC, actions that constitute interference with another's non-abusive fulfillment of their own rational interests, are illegitimate. Actions that result in the frustration of interests, due to misalignment of interests between parties, are irrational, constitute "abuse", and are illegitimate. Abuse must be defended against. The Fulfillment of Interests as a value is implied by Rational Justification. Rational Justification of anything beyond pure rationalism requires appealing to the normative value of Interests, so any interaction that violates the value of Interests is rationally unjustifiable. As interactions ought to be rationally justifiable, that justification must be based in Interests, if an interaction cannot be justified on rationalism alone. Inherent Interest Theory explains how Yoggism implies some interests take priority over others, it defines Inherent Interests as interests that act as a conduit for other interests, and explains the difference between actions that inherently frustrate and actions that frustrate for external reasons. Justification Ethics grants the value of Interests based on rational interactions. This grants interests as a value, as well as self-defense of rational interests, but not clearance to do evil for "the greater good". Instead, defense of the pillars that uphold Interests themselves can justify ideas reflecting Threshold Deontology and how a breakdown of rational deliberation should be avoided at all costs. Giving to the poor, self-defense, and frustrating to prevent existential disaster, are all different. Good, Right, and merely Justifiable. Only sentient beings have interests relevant to Justification Ethics and Yoggism, as these beings can be described in terms of the rationality of their behavior relative to different standards. A water bottle cannot behave irrationally, yet sentient beings can. Normative Will is thus the capacity for normative evaluation of behaviors relative to standards beyond the mere laws of physics, including rationality, ethics, and personal preferences. Every sentient being possesses some degree of this Normative Will. This also functions as a measure of how strongly Justification Ethics may apply to a given sentient being. The value of well-rounded Consent can be derived via Justification Ethics. This virtue-wise can be framed as a Respect for Interests broadly. Through this value, is inaction always justified? A framing of Virtue Ethics in terms of the Respect for Interests solves this problem, regardless of Justification Ethics granting explicit obligations, there is a basis for good character. This grants the Yogg virtue Principle: You ought to act in a way consistent with the virtues that curate respect for interests. Self-Ownership can be justified under Yoggism based on Consent, where abusive conduct is framed as a violation of consent, in a way that contradicts the Absolutist View of Ownership; due to it contradicting interests. You thus own your Interests, and Preferences, via the normative value of Interests, and also your Body and Mind as they are the primary conduit of your interests. Inherent Frustration is condemnable in local spaces; to be censored for honest criticism or fired for unfair reasons is inherent frustration even if done in the larger purview of property rights rather than direct use of force, as abusive use of property based on Interest Property Theory is not ethically justifiable. Due to the tendency for monopolization and more broadly centralization of firms in an unregulated market economy, caused by varying barriers to entry, inconsistency of perfect competition, and the self-reinforcing nature of market share growth, unregulated market economies naturally lead to abusive outcomes. All Yoggism Pages https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggism https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text0_oughts-from-logic https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text1_anti-abuse-principle https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text2_justification-ethics https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text_deduction-of-interests https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text9_inherent-interest-theory https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text6_retaliatory-law https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text5_normative-will https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text4_absolute-interest-conclusion https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text3_yogg-virtue-theory https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text7_interest-property-theory https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text8_markets-and-interest-alignment https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text2_yoggism-as-a-procedural-norm https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text_refutation-of-argumentation-ethics https://www.tc-blox.net/yoggtexts/text_refutationofthenap
- Help Center | TC Blox Studios
Have a problem? Contact us, we'll help you with issues with our games, information, and other problems. Help Center Have Questions or Suggestions? Have a Bug Report for one of my Projects? Submit a Ticket and I'll get back to you! OR you can send an email at: tcblox110@gmail.com If you have a specific question, you can browse the FAQ Search the Site Browse our Games Browse our Videos Send an Email Enter your Name Enter your Email Address Explain the issue you're having or question you have Submit Thanks for your ticket, I'll get back to you! More of my Content, Only on TC-BLOX.NET: Assets Games Demo Projects Bob Simulator The Movy Chronicles Admin Abuse Resistance Yogg Interest Theory (Yoggism) Videos Music Contributors About Help Center 3D Models - Textures - Music YouTube Videos - MiniMods - Shorts Legal Information and Licenses
- Bob Sim Space Demo | TC Blox Studios
See the Demo Projects we have available for online play Bob Simulator: Space Demo Bob Sim: Space Demo is Free and Open-Source under the Open-Source 2024 License . Download for Windows and Linux (64-bit) , View on Itch.io A prototype of the Space mode (and a super bare-bones City mode) of my 3D Sandbox Game Bob Simulator. This game is primarily a demo of the Space Travel simulator part. NOTE: I would strongly recommend downloading the Windows or Linux version rather than playing through web. The city present is an old version and not representative of the current stage of development of the game. NOTE 2: Hold P to go back to Menu, the pause menu doesn't work in Web. Use R to toggle spaceship controls. More controls are below. You can see more on Bob Simulator here: https://www.tc-blox.net/bobsimulator CONTROLS: WASD to Move, Mouse to Look Left Click or F to Whack P to open Pause/Popup Menu B to Dance Hold P to go back to Menu automatically SPACESHIP CONTROLS: R to control and stop controlling Spaceship Q and E to Roll left and right WASD for Spaceship Turning SPACE to Accelerate ship SHIFT to Fast-Accelerate ship RIGHT SHIFT to Turbo-Accelerate LEFT CONTROL (CTRL) to Decelerate (bring ship to a stop) EXTRA CONTROLS (limited web support): F1: Hide UI F2: Take Screenshot F3: Show Debug Menu F4 and F5: Change Perspectives (thirdperson, firstperson, etc) F11: Toggle Fullscreen BUGS TO BE AWARE OF: 1. Lag in world loading and planet loading (in web export). 2. All planets are green-ish in web export. 3. Jumping is unstable. (demo uses an outdated system for collision detection, newer versions use updated raycasts)
- Games | TC Blox Studios
See the games TC Blox Studios has in development. Games Projects we have in development or currently available. Check them out and send us feedback ! Usage of my Games and Projects is subject to the Content Licens e . Topple The Tower Coming Soon See Development Activity Play Legacy Demo Bob Simulator See Devlogs See Development Activity No Bath View Demo See Development Activity
- banana | TC Blox Studios
banana banana
- Assets | TC Blox Studios
Assets you can use in your own projects, courtesy of TC Blox Studios. Assets Assets made by us for people like you! You are free to use any of these in your own projects. Usage of these assets is subject to the Fair-Use 2024 License . (basically, you must credit TC Blox Studios for the Assets in the projects you use them in) 3D Models Textures Music
- Content License | TC Blox Studios
Terms pertaining to your legal usage of our Game-Projects, Videos, and other Content from TC Blox Studios. Content License (for Games and Videos) By downloading or otherwise using the Content available on our website, you hereby agree to the following Content License . Below are the rules and terms relating to "Content" which in this context refers to the Games , Videos , and Shorts on this web site that you can download and/or play in the web or otherwise use. Specific Content may have it's own unique details related to licensing, the exact limitations should be provided with the Content if it is downloadable. ----PAGE LAST UPDATED : 2026/06/07, YEAR/MONTH/DAY ---- --Rule #1: Usage Guidelines-- You are not allowed to re-sell any of the Content from our website on its own. If you download specific Content from our website, you are not allowed to re-sell it elsewhere for profit on its own. All Content on this website is under the ownership of TC Blox Studios. (The usage guidelines do not apply to works licensed as Creative Commons.) -Transformative Works, Let's Plays, and Machinimas- You may create and distribute Online Videos, Machinimas, Let's Plays, and Showcases made with our Content freely, as an individual. You may create transformative works of art, such as YouTube videos, and let's play videos, or other forms of media featuring video or image media of our Content. These are referred to as 'creative works' for the purposes of this section. There are no all-out restrictions given by this license on what kinds of creative works and transformative works you create. You can create whatever you want. If you distribute creative works, made with our Content, on behalf of some sort of group comprised of or affiliated with more than one person, you are fine as long as you meet the following criteria: 1. You are not affiliated with and acting on behalf of a governmental agency or entity that is spreading hateful messages, prejudice, defamatory accusations, or activity that violates human rights. 2. You are not affiliated with and acting on behalf of a corporation, organization, or company worth more than $1,000,000 USD and also creating media under the pretense of advertising, promotional material, or otherwise dishonest matters, or is spreading hateful messages, prejudice, defamatory accusations, or activity that violates human rights. 3. You are not affiliated with and acting on behalf of a political campaigning group spreading misinformation and/or ideas, claims, accusations, and justifications based on statistically false, prejudiced, or defamatory grounds. If you do not meet this criteria, you must obtain legitimate permission from TC Blox Studios to proceed. (send us a support ticket) Do not abuse our leniency towards online media in an attempt to spread harmful or dishonest messages, or for unfair promotion. (Summary: You may create and distribute online videos and showcases as an individual freely.) --Rule #2: Servers, Fan-made Merch, Monetization, and Fan-art-- Servers may be created, hosted, and played on through our Content (such as video games created by TC Blox Studios). You are allowed to create and monetize Servers for our Content that is video games freely as long as you do not do the following: 1. Use Servers to spread computer viruses, malware, or other malicious computer code involuntarily. (you are allowed to test these things in a small group with people who consent to it, but don't try to trick people) 2. Use Servers to spread or facilitate scams, spam, illegal financial activity. (you are allowed to sell stuff on hosted Servers, including virtual currencies, donation rewards, ranks, merchandise, fan-art, skins, and whatever else is applicable, but you must sell them in an honest way that does not facilitate a scam) 3. Use Servers and other hosted Content to benefit companies worth more than $1,000,000 USD that are spreading hateful messages, prejudice, defamatory accusations, or activity that violates human rights. There are no all-out restrictions given by this license on what kinds of servers and server content you create. You can create whatever you want. You are allowed to create Fan-made content, specifically Fan-art and Merchandise that is inspired by our Content. You may monetize your Fan-art and Merchandise freely, with no limitations as long as it isn't defamatory or constitutes a scam. There are no all-out restrictions given by this license on what kinds of Fan-made content you create. You can create whatever you want. You are allowed to use any music present in our Content freely on the internet, you are allowed to use it in your own Fan-made content and in your own Machinimas, Let's Play Videos, YouTube Videos, and Showcases. (Summary: You can make Music, Fan-art, Merch, host Servers, and sell stuff on Servers freely; but don't scam or spread malware) --Rule #3: Mods, Addons, and Plugins-- You are allowed to create Addons/Mods/Plugins for our Content that is video games, and these Addons/Mods/Plugins can be distributed if they do not contain a significant portion of our Content. You are allowed to freely distribute Addons/Mods/Plugins made to be compatible with our Content yet do not portions of our Content, completely freely and even commercially. If Addons/Mods/Plugins contain a significant portion of our Content, they must be distributed for free and credit to TC Blox Studios must be provided both in the download if it is downloadable, and on the website or other media the Addons/Mods/Plugins are distributed on. When it comes to larger projects by TC Blox Studios, like projects comprising more than just a few images, audio files, video files, etc, actions constituting plagiarism such as redistribution of a significant portion of the Content, as well as 'free-booting', is not allowed unless it's explicitly for archival purposes and credit to TC Blox Studios is given. (you can sell mods as much as you want as long as they dont contain significant portions of our Content) You are allowed to sell Addons/Mods/Plugins made to be compatible with our Content. We do not regulate or put limitations on what kinds of Addons/Mods/Plugins are made for our Content, unless it is an attempt at illegal activity, scams, malware, etc. There are no all-out restrictions given by this license on what kinds of Addons/Mods/Plugins you create. You can create whatever you want. (Summary: You can make and distribute Mods for our Content freely as well as commercially, but don't plagiarize.)











